There are a lot of options for handling your files these days. Deciding on a specific system for your company or your own personal business might seem overwhelming, given the litany of articles comparing file storage options against each other. Despite the noticeable similarities between most file storage options, there’s a considerable amount of variety in their offered features and capabilities.
So taking due diligence towards finding a perfect solution is good news for us at Flight, as long as you aren’t exclusively googling “file storage service.” We don’t offer what could be called a traditional file storage service, even though Flight is definitely a solution that stores your files. The preconceptions of what file storage should be, created by Dropbox and the like, are understandable given how they kicked off the cloud-based file storage industry. But it has led to some misconceptions for a relative newcomer like us, especially since Flight does a lot more than file storage:
Misconception #1: Flight is more or less the same as Box, Google Drive, ect.
Hardly. We admire those companies and their services, but they don’t focus on solving content management issues like we do. Flight was designed to do much more than act as a file repository; it allows for more involved metadata management, branding options, and better means of working with your digital media supply chain.
Some file storage services do offer content management functions, but compared to Flight, they’re either watered down or difficult to use. Box’s metadata management, for example, requires way more technical prowess than Flight’s does.
Misconception #2: Flight can’t hold as much data as a file storage service can.
Not even close to true, although like other file storage services, the amount of storage you receive is contingent on what you pay for. In terms of storage capability, Flight has no maximum storage space. This is exactly what the well-known storage services offer with their enterprise options.
Just because Flight lets users do more with their files doesn’t mean storage capacity is sacrificed for it.
Misconception #3: Flight is just adopting new technology that’s unnecessary if you already have a file storage solution
Judging by the direction that file storage services are heading, they would be the first to disagree with that. More dynamic content management and DAM features are going to be very popular in the future. While file storage services try to incorporate those soon-to-be-necessary features, they can already be used in Flight.
What really fuels the comparison between Flight and traditional file storage services is this question: what do you want to accomplish when managing your files?
If your answer is to have a repository for files in a central location, than any file storage solution will do. If you want to have more management over your files, put an emphasis on content, and establish more productive processes with your teams, then you may be a perfect user for Flight.